the royal tour

2 November, 2005 at 9:59 am 3 comments

It's been far too long since I was actively blogging here! I blame the start of the church year – September and October have been manic. So Charles and Camilla begin their US tour today. And the question is, can Camilla woo the Diana-ites over? Isn't it tragic that a marriage is public property in the way that Charles' marriages have been? I write as an ardent anti-royalist, but on this one, I want to put in a plea for Charles. What a bizarre system we have here in the UK! The heir to the throne had to marry a "suitable" wife. Apart from anything else, she had to be a virgin (and be tested!). So on all sorts of grounds, Charles the human being is prevented from marrying the woman he loves. Well, let's be candid: he's prevented from marrying for love, full stop. In the 20th century (an nothing's changed with the new millennium) we are still running a system of royal marriage as alliance! I have every sympathy with Diana when she complained that there were three people in her marriage (to say nothing of the numbers she herself brought to the party!). Diana was treated very shabbily by her husband. But I still blame the system. We assume that the heart of the marriage relationship is love and the desire to be together. The bit in the service about "forsaking all others" presumes that the reason for getting married to this particular person is because this is the person one wishes to spend life with, rather than anyone else. Marriages are under enough pressure at the best of times: imagine having had to plan with the woman you love how to go about marrying someone else! Poor guy! So here's my one and only plea for sympathy for the royals. We set them up – we put them into impossible situations like this, then we demand a fairytale story of them and are outraged when it doesn't happen. One of my chief problems with the monarchy is that the system wrecks lives – theirs! And we are the ones who do it.


Entry filed under: current affairs.

feeding places everybody needs a tame ..

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Lucy  |  6 November, 2005 at 2:48 pm

    Oh, Hello! We are not the ones who do it.
    Charles (the human being?) was not prevented from marrying the woman he loved. He gave Charles, (the heir to the throne), priority and betrayed himself first, Camilla second, Di third. Our families – and our cultures impose upon all of us their expectations about marriage and many other things. It is up to us to sort out what we want, even if it means a huge and unholy muddle.
    You are displaying strange sympathies.
    Poor guy – my foot.

  • 2. Nick  |  27 November, 2005 at 8:35 pm

    Errmm . . you mean they tested Camilla for virginity? What was the result? I think we should be told. It’s not the fault of the system. It’s ours for putting up with this shower of inbred German halfwits . . .

  • 3. Anonymous  |  7 December, 2005 at 4:15 pm

    Nick’s not being fair. You can’t abdicate from being inbred, Gwerman or half-witted. It’s a job for life.–>


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Time to move …

... to my own hosted site on See you there.

Recent Posts

Flickr Photos

blog stats

  • 8,314 hits

%d bloggers like this: